Categories
General

Canon: Another hallmark of support stupidity

How much space does it take to maintain the drivers, support document and other bits you need in order to run an electronics product? Not much, I would say, probably a few dozen megabytes at the most. How much does a multi-billion dollar organization, let alone a global force in imaging, makes on the products we buy from it? Well, several billions of dollars, you would hope. You would therefore expect such a company to have the petty cash to maintain the aforementioned drivers, manuals and software for your product even after it stops making it, for the remote chance you would need to download those documents when you install that product anew on a different machine, right?

If you are talking about Canon, you would be dead false. You see, if you do not own a product from the last two years, well, you are dead in the water. Really. I have a Canon Pixma MP150 printer/scanner which I actually like and DO spend good money buying original ink for. But you see, Canon does not care enough about you or me, for that matter, to still have the files I need or expect to have there for me, on its site. If you go to their website’s support section or look for download for your device, and if that device is well, older than say, two years, you would find nothing. They do not care anymore. Or they cannot afford the cost of space. I would love to give them the space if they want me to host the files. I can afford it.

Reminds me of the conspiracy theorists who say that printers have a built-in limited lifespan. That is, you buy a vacuum cleaner and the manufacturer built it just bad enough so it dies 3 days after the warranty expires. In the case of Canon, that is probably right – if your printer is older than two years, maybe it should be dead already. Not sure Canon will stay on my shortlist anymore.

Share
Categories
Cars

Chrysler: Ugly cars don’t sell, do they?

According to the Wall Street Journal (quoted in Jalopnik), Chrysler is talking to Nissan about farming out small and mid-size car production to Japanese firm. The Wall Street Journal also had a rather eye-opening list of car sales figures, showing the Camry and Accord up top, and somewhere down there, with less than 4000 cars sold for the month of July, Chrysler.

How did Chrysler fall so low? They can make cool cars, like the Dodge Charger and 300C, and in the recent past its cars were interesting to look at (still fell apart but that’s a different story) like the Dodge Intrepid and Stratus which were powerful and fun to drive. The convertible Sebring was quite attractive, too.

These days, sadly, the produce truly hideous cars.
The Sebring and Avenger are just plain ugly. They are smaller, yes, but they look perplexingly half-baked. The tail is just incomplete and does not cover the back properly. The hood has ugly lengthwise metal strips and the headlights just look unappealing. These are two really ugly, blah cars. The only thing that was as ugly in recent memory is the 1990s Buick Skylark with its awful front.

It is just sad that they are giving up when their own designers create the best looking, butch (in a good way) cars (Charger is a favorite of mine). This time, manufacturing in America is giving up because the designers just suck, and that’s sad.

Share
Categories
General

Microsoft LiveMeeting gets a D

My company is evaluating Microsoft LiveMeeting as an alternative to Adobe Acrobat Connect (formerly known as Macromedia Breeze). The installation of the plugin is clunky – a plain old download and installation from Firefox, though without a browser restart. The layout is even more confusing than that’s of Acrobat Connect, with menus that open but do not really close, and menu items that are not really descriptive. Not sure if it was our fault but image quality was just awful. So it works – you can see what the presenter wants you to see, but other than that, it is no fun.

Share
Share