<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari for Windows: Nobody needs it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enavigo.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-nobody-needs-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enavigo.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-nobody-needs-it/</link>
	<description>Take lemons, make lemonade or Jill and Yuval's Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:21:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric F. Savage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari for Windows: No Thanks</title>
		<link>http://www.enavigo.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-nobody-needs-it/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric F. Savage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Safari for Windows: No Thanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enavigo.com/2007/06/12/safari-for-windows-nobody-needs-it/#comment-745</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m with many others, including Yuval, in saying that Apple porting Safari to Windows is unfortunate. Web developers have basically got 3 main browsers to deal with right now, and adding a 4th isn&#8217;t going to help. IE6 is dying, but still prevalent. IE7 isn&#8217;t great, but is obviously a force to be reckoned with. Firefox is bloated and slow, but comfy and relatively painless to develop against. Safari is outdated, buggy and less standards-compatible than IE7 or Firefox, often intentionally so (try styling a submit button). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m with many others, including Yuval, in saying that Apple porting Safari to Windows is unfortunate. Web developers have basically got 3 main browsers to deal with right now, and adding a 4th isn&#8217;t going to help. IE6 is dying, but still prevalent. IE7 isn&#8217;t great, but is obviously a force to be reckoned with. Firefox is bloated and slow, but comfy and relatively painless to develop against. Safari is outdated, buggy and less standards-compatible than IE7 or Firefox, often intentionally so (try styling a submit button). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
